Sponsor




Columns

Lombardi's Way - Ravens' fans struggle with team's youth movement

Written By:  
Ravens' fans struggle with team's youth movement

Baltimore is an interesting town and its citizens collectively suffer from an inferiority complex. That’s not meant as a knock. That’s just the way it is.

I should know…I’m one of you.

Back in a day, Baltimore was viewed as a gas stop between DC and Philadelphia. Today thanks in large part to popular TV drama series like “The Wire” and “Homicide: Life on the Street” it is seen by many as a cesspool of drugs, STD’s and violence.

Those of us who were born and raised here in The Land of Pleasant Living know otherwise. We see it as a metropolitan area of ethnic neighborhoods, rich with character; a mecca for exquisite culinary arts; a charm city by the Chesapeake featuring generation after generation that never leaves home.

Yet when we hear about our crime blotter it dents our civic pride.

 Baltimore was often overlooked. Were we a small, unattractive city or were we just a big town lacking a true identity?

Then one day along came Johnny Unitas and the Baltimore Colts to give the city a red star on the map and register an identity in the consciousness of our country.

The Colts flourished and soon thereafter so did the Orioles. We became a town of sports champions and as America noticed we embraced it to soothe our insecurities.

Predictably we attached ourselves to our sports heroes. Besides Unitas there were other Colts and then Orioles like Frank and Brooks Robinson. They were more than stars of their respective sports – they were and are Baltimore icons.

Now, fast forward to the modern day, and the state of sports here in Baltimore…

The Orioles are a train wreck and there’s no relief in sight. Nearly polar opposites of Peter Angelos’ money sucking machine, the Ravens are a finely tuned organization that continues to get better. And as we have in the past we gravitate towards those players with whom we can identify.

And THEY become our contemporary luminaries.

As a result of the Orioles struggles combined with a difficult economy and so many political uncertainties the Ravens have become a sanctuary – an escape from the insanity. They are an oasis in which to bathe in good news within the barren desert of bad news that envelopes us.

But along with that lofty perch the Ravens occupy here in Baltimore there comes pressure.

If the Ravens make decisions and act upon them in a way that confuses the fans, there is a backlash. And we’ve seen that over the past two weeks – two weeks during which we've witnessed the exodus of popular players like Willis McGahee, Kelly Gregg, Todd Heap and Derrick Mason. Those moves were for many the equivalent of dumping waste in our oasis.

McGahee was a touchdown machine with a boyish charm.

Gregg – a lunch pail blue collar overachiever and an underdog just like the town that embraced him.

Heap – a player who has been with the franchise for two-thirds of its existence.

And Mason, a player who stepped up as a leader on offense when the team desperately needed one.

Letting them go isn’t easy for this town. And that’s understandable.

But you should take comfort in the fact that those guys in the Ravens ivory tower have forgotten more about football and about running an NFL team than any of us will ever know. They have the short and long-term best interests of the team in the forefront of their minds.

And now they have determined that it’s time for some of the young guys to step up.

The league’s best teams do this all the time. We’ve seen the Colts let go of Marvin Harrison and the Steelers parting ways with Alan Faneca and Plaxico Burress. And let’s not forget about how Bill Belichick quickly says goodbye to the Teddy Bruschis and Mike Vrabels of the world.

Besides if the Ravens could have afforded to keep all of those players, would they have made much of a difference? Would all (save Gregg) have made the Ravens offense any better?

It’s often said that doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results is the definition of insanity.

Maybe it’s time to do things a little differently.

It’s ok to miss them – to be nostalgic and reminisce. Those players are ingrained in our civic souls. But to sustain excellence you have to be willing to change and adapt even if it hurts a little.

And that’s not easy, particularly for us Baltimoreans who are as loyal as rescued mutts.

That’s just the way it is.

 

Post your comment

Your Name:
Your Email:
Your Comment:
Tony Lombardi
Posted On: 8/8/11 9:31 pm
Dave,

Links are permitted on our message board...

Good points but even "experts" aren't static...they evolve, live and learn from mistakes. The same can be said about those with access to "experts."

Or so I've heard...
dave
Posted On: 8/8/11 4:09 pm
But you should take comfort in the fact that Lawrence Summers, Gene Sperling, Christina Romer, Austan Goolsbee, Ben Bernanke, Henry Paulson, & Timothy Geithner have forgotten more about the economy and economics than any of us will ever know. They have the short and long-term best interests of the country in the forefront of their minds.

How are they doing ?

As late as May (2007), Bernanke gave a speech in which he opined that “the effect of the troubles in the subprime sector on the broader housing market will likely be limited.” NYTimes Sunday Magazine 1/20/2008
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Folly of Experts" (Since this site does not permit the posting of links, for those open-minded they can Google this blogpost from March 26, 2009)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Back to our football experts. I'm all for getting younger ...gradually. Not cutting loose all of the experienced skill players from a playoff team except Rice & Boldin and replacing them with what ? I don't care a whit about hanging on to fan favorites; but they have to be replaced with something better or at least the prospect of being better.

Btw, these are the same FO experts who have decried "wasting" high draft picks on young wide receivers the past many years because rookie wide receivers were deemed unreliable. After all that's why they acquired three veteran wide receivers last year in a much ballyhooed offseason. But one yr later all, whom their expertise selected, but Boldin have been cut loose.

And now we should believe that these same experts have become adept at doing what they couldn't do previously -- evaluate young wide receivers.

In addition to the danger of believing in the infallibility of experts is being seduced by having access to experts.
Luigi
Posted On: 8/8/11 8:31 am
Lombardi, when did you become Michael Olesker? Nicely written but I forgot what the topic was until the end. Regardless, I agree with you from top to bottom. I'm a mutt too .
Michael Martin
Posted On: 8/8/11 8:22 am
Very well written Tony. I couldn't agree more.
Eric Buckner
Posted On: 8/7/11 1:33 pm
Well done sir. It does hurt to see these guys go, but the team needs to get younger to stay competitive. Time for the last few draft classes to step up.
Joey B
Posted On: 8/7/11 11:24 am
The title threw me for a loop there for a while but a nice read here TL & spot on I might add. I must admit that I was ticked off about the four guys being cut but after thinking it over and then considering this article I'll take the leap of faith. Go Ravens!



«Go back to the previous page.
Written By:  

Polls

From the following list who will have the most sacks in 2012?


Twitter

Check us out on Twitter
  • 5/23/12: Somebody hit me up...at O's game and Flaherty can't hit his way out of a wet paper bag...is something wrong W/ Hardy?
  • 5/22/12: There's a Betemit Sandwich!
  • 5/22/12: Sox' Doubront reminds me of Andy Petitte

View all tweets & follow us!