Sponsor




Columns

Lombardi's Way - LOMBARDI'S WAY: Ravens, NFL need to remember what honor means

Written By:  
LOMBARDI'S WAY: Ravens, NFL need to remember what honor means

Want to stir up a debate at your local watering hole?

Just mention the Ravens Ring of Honor and then kick around the merits of each of its inductees.

Do they all belong?

Induction should be an award of distinction for unique and exemplary accomplishments.  It should represent greatness in achievement. It should acknowledge uncommon feats.

Now the first thing you need to do while gauging the worthiness of current and even future inductees is cast aside the notion that the measuring stick for the Ravens Ring of Honor is Earnest Byner.  That’s a joke – an egregious error on the part of Art Modell who immediately cheapened the distinction for all Ring inductees. 

So let’s just kick his induction to the curb and call it a momentary lapse of reasoning. Art should have just given the man best known for “The Fumble” a company watch for years of service instead of that plaque.

The members of the Baltimore Colts in the Ravens Ring…they don’t belong there either.  Great guys, great accomplishments – not Ravens, sorry!  Maybe they should have designed wall plaques for the honored former Colts and hung them around Unitas Plaza.  They were Colts after all, not Ravens and they don’t belong in the Ravens’ Ring – period, end of story!

Michael McCrary…terrific work effort, an overachiever and a Baltimore blue-collar guy and I love him on my team any day of the week and three times on Sunday. But was he great? Do two Pro Bowl seasons qualify you as uncommon? If it were up to me, I’d take a screw gun to the plaque and bring it down too!

Four-time Pro Bowler Peter Boulware was a terrific player and an exemplary man off the field and in the community. Tough call here but I’m still going to say no. Fifty-eight, c’mon down!

 Art Modell is in the Ring and deservedly so.  He belongs in the Pro Football Hall of Fame so the Ring is a given.

Jon Ogden – no brainer. He should have been the standard upon which all future nominees would be measured.

Ozzie Newsome?

Make it three!

Brian Billick…interesting debate here but I say thumbs down as a Ring inductee.  Billick did an outstanding job in 2000 by keeping his team together and avoiding an implosion after 21 consecutive quarters without scoring a touchdown on their way to a World Championship. 

But what did he do before or since that is so distinguished?  Does riding the coattails of an amazing defense qualify as excellence? What about wasting several years of standout defensive play with substandard offensive play?

Am I glad Billick came along?

Absolutely!

He brought attitude and resolve to a franchise that sorely needed it at the time but does that make him great?

Nope!

How does a coach who is fired with four years remaining on a five year contract deserve to be in the Ring of Honor?

Jamal Lewis.  I say pass…too much drama, a relative train-wreck off the field and he’s done nothing but trash the organization since he’s been gone. Maybe his trucking company can haul away all these unnecessary plaques.

Chris McAlister…c’mon man! 

Without question CMac was a great talent.

Also without question he was a classic underachiever and hardly a model citizen.

How did McAlister distinguish himself, as the Ravens resident party boy?

Recently NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell was asked about off-the-field behavior and if that should factor into the voting for Hall of Fame candidates.

"I do believe that it's more than just how you conduct yourself on the field," Goodell said.  "I believe very firmly that it's how you conduct yourself on and off the field as a member of the National Football League.  That's part of your contribution to the game."

Upon hearing this many criticized Goodell, mistaking his opinion for initiating a movement to exact such a change.

"These are decisions the Hall of Fame is going to have to make, not me," Goodell said.  "But if you ask me a specific question, 'Is it just their contributions on the field and their statistics?'  I don't think that's the case.  I think it's about what you contribute to the game of football."

Put me in Roger’s corner. The same thought process should be embraced by the Ravens when considering ROH inductees.

You know when you stop and think about it, there should be Arthur B., Ozzie and J.O. for now and that’s it!  

Ray Lewis and Matt Stover, when their numbers are called – automatic inductees!

The same can be said for Ed Reed.

After that, time will tell.

Until then, let’s remember what the words “honor” and “distinction” really mean and that inductees should stand the test of time.

Otherwise they better start making those plaques a lot smaller for the ring because it’s going to get crowded up there. 

 

Post your comment

Your Name:
Your Email:
Your Comment:
Sean Mitchell
Posted On: 6/23/10 1:51 pm
I agree with Corey - the Ring of Honor is not only for HOF caliber players. For example, the Redskins ROH honors Joe Theisman, Gary Clark, and Vince Lombardi. Neither Theisman or Clark are in the HOF and Lombardi only coached there one year. I agree that Byner should not be there, however I have no problem with either McCrary or Boulware. I think people underate McCrary - IMHO, he was the defensive MVP of the 2000 Ravens playoff run. Billick & Jamal Lewis are no-brainers. If you are a Super Bowl winning coach, you belong in the Ring of Honor. Just how many Super bowl winning coaches are there? It is a small fraternity. Also, if you are a franchise's all time rusher, had a 2000 yard season, and have over 10,000 career yards, you belong in the Ring of Honor. The Baltimore Colts definitely belong there. It may be the Ravens ROH, but it is not the Raven's Stadium. That stadium was bought and paid for by the Maryland taxpayer. Without the Colts and the tradition that those players established, there would be no Baltimore Ravens. We should honor the past, not erase history.
Corey
Posted On: 5/25/10 6:35 pm
I disagree with this for the most part. A team's ring of honor is not to honor those people who are HOF worthy, its to honor those who have a distinguished themselves in the franchise's history. I agree about Colts players, Cmac, and Mcrary.

Billick: Accomplished alot of Baltimore Ravens first. First winning season, playoff appearance, playoff win, and Superbowl. I think he deserves to be there.

Jamal Lewis: His 2000 yard season alone puts him there.

Peter Boulware: Is the franchise's first recipient of a major AP award and he had a very good albiet short career. He deserves to be there.

I also believe the following people should be honored:
OJ Brigance: What he has meant to this organization and its players can not be put into words. Not mention he IS a very distinct part of Baltimore history.

Todd Heap: Will hold every Ravens recieving record when he finally retires and there isnt anyone that will take those away from him in the forseeable future. Not to mention he's been a fan favorite and the embodiment of what this organization and town is all about.
Dave MacMickey
Posted On: 5/25/10 9:58 am
I disagree about the Colts players, and i'm a 28 year old who never saw the Colts play.

The Colts players in the ring of honor were Baltimoreans, great football players, and built up the fanbase that existed for us to even get the Ravens back.
Mr. Ed
Posted On: 5/24/10 1:18 pm
Peter Boulware is a definite. He was all about honor and he was a warrior. He did more with one arm than most do with two and he was a game changer!
Mrs. Boulware
Posted On: 5/24/10 7:44 am
You are outside your mind regarding Peter Boulware.



«Go back to the previous page.
Written By:  

Polls

From the following list who will have the most sacks in 2012?


Twitter

Check us out on Twitter
  • 5/23/12: Somebody hit me up...at O's game and Flaherty can't hit his way out of a wet paper bag...is something wrong W/ Hardy?
  • 5/22/12: There's a Betemit Sandwich!
  • 5/22/12: Sox' Doubront reminds me of Andy Petitte

View all tweets & follow us!