Sponsor




Columns

Lombardi's Way - Goodell reduced to a puppet on a string

Written By:  
Goodell reduced to a puppet on a string

Paul Tagliabue will never win any popularity contests in Baltimore. If anything, he’s probably just a notch above Bob Irsay, Peter Angelos and Hines Ward as the most vilified sports figures in The Land of Pleasant Living.

That said Baltimoreans should be missing Tagliabue right about now.

Why?

His replacement looks like nothing more than a patsy.

If you can think back to the days of Tagliabue objectively and without malice, outside of his obvious bias against Baltimore, you would have to say that he did a pretty decent job fueling the game’s ascent to the pinnacle of sports while maintaining labor peace.

Never did you feel that the NFLPA would ever flip ownership on its head like its counterpart in MLB. Tagliabue’s relationship with Union Chief Gene Upshaw was solid – even friendly. It was so friendly that many questioned Upshaw’s competency because from the outside looking in it appeared that the late Upshaw kowtowed to Tagliabue.

Even the NFL owners, Tagliabue’s 32 bosses, seemed to kowtow a bit to the man who thinks Baltimore needs more museums.

My how things have changed!

On one hand you have a newcomer in NFLPA Executive Director DeMaurice Smith who has something to prove. He can’t allow ownership to roll over him – you know, the ones who want about a half billion dollar refund. So he has to take off the gloves, absorb some body blows and fight the good fight for his constituents who are watching closely.

On the other hand there is Goodell.

Now when he first hit the scene, Roger entered swinging a big stick while delivering heavy handed fines for player offenses. The penalties, relatively speaking were on par with jail time for parking tickets when compared to Tagliabue’s slaps on the wrist.

So given the new “sheriff’s” bravado you would have thought that Goodell would have been an influential force during the NFL labor wars. Instead he’s been nothing more than a puppet on the owners’ strings.

Here we have a league laced with billionaires and millionaires that continues to thrive despite a very bad economy. Salaries across the continent are flat. Millions have lost their jobs. Yet fans continue to pay the league’s rising prices.

If you build it, we will come.

But what if they tear it down instead?

Greed in the NFL is tearing at the fabric of the great game we’ve come to know and love.  Each side is hell bent on “winning” while the fans, those who make the 1,700 players millionaires and the 32 owners billionaires are the losers.

Why does this have to be a zero sum game? Why can’t both sides win?

The players seem ready to litigate while they work.

The owners seem to want to crush the union while bleeding the players.

This is where Paul Tagliabue would have stood up and restored sanity. Instead Goodell tucks his tail, hides from the fan boos on draft day behind an orchestrated and insincere salute to the tornado victims in the south – a salute that was nothing more than a red herring.

Go fish!

I was once a fan Roger, but now unfortunately you have reduced yourself to a more polished version of Bud Selig.

And somewhere, while the owners puppet you around, De Smith is smiling.

Maybe even laughing!

It’s time to man up!

 

Post your comment

Your Name:
Your Email:
Your Comment:
Tony Lombardi
Posted On: 5/7/11 2:05 pm
I hear you Brian and this certainly puts at risk any hope that Tagliabue had for HOF (efforts for which I hope fall on their face.)

But my point is at least he got things going and as you allude to, the owners took his advice.

At least they included escape clauses for both sides if the deal wasn't good and at least there was no work stoppage. To me the escapes represented a compromise, a safety lever if the plan failed.

I don't see Goodell being strong enough to promote the concept of compromise to the owners -- and I hope I'm proven wrong.
Mike
Posted On: 5/6/11 8:26 am
Every single team makes money - a lot of money (though the owners tried to get us to buy that some were losing money, they eventually fessed-up that no one is in the red). The owners canceled a contract (something that when a player wants to do the same they call him disloyal.). Then they demanded that their take off the top be doubled and the players share of what's left be reduced. I'm sure any of us, confronted with the same situation would fight it anyway we could. Mr. Godell's job is to speak truth to power and work toward reasonable compromise. Maybe, behind the scenes, he's tried to do that. Thus far unsuccessfully. Mr. Smith's job is to get whatever he can for his clients while negotiating in good faith. The owners are of an elite class who are used to getting pretty much whatever they want no matter the venue. It will take time to get everyone on the same page and working toward the ultimate goal. We the fans have long been a tertiary consideration. that is not going to change.
Brian
Posted On: 5/5/11 6:56 pm
TL - Sorry, have to disagree about Tags. It's his fault that the game is in the position it is now. He was so eager to make the CBA extension of 2006 into his lasting legacy to the game that he gave away the farm to the NFLPA. The cap increased by over 60% in just 5 years, so much so that even as salaries increase exponentially, teams could still not keep up with the cap (which further increased the cap for the next year).

The owners are at fault for going along with him, sure, but he put "labor piece" over the good of the game, which ironically, lead to the mess that exists today!



«Go back to the previous page.
Written By:  

Polls

From the following list who will have the most sacks in 2012?


Twitter

Check us out on Twitter
  • 5/23/12: Somebody hit me up...at O's game and Flaherty can't hit his way out of a wet paper bag...is something wrong W/ Hardy?
  • 5/22/12: There's a Betemit Sandwich!
  • 5/22/12: Sox' Doubront reminds me of Andy Petitte

View all tweets & follow us!