Sponsor




Home  >  Columns   >  Draft Analysis  >  RAVENS DRAFT ANALYSIS FULLBACKS

Columns

Draft Analysis - RAVENS DRAFT ANALYSIS: FULLBACKS

Posted On: 4/27/07
Written By:  
Matt Ennis
RAVENS DRAFT ANALYSIS: FULLBACKS
It seems quite likely the Ravens will draft one of the top available fullbacks with Justin Green returning from a knee injury and Mike Anderson being a few years removed from the position.  Who exactly are the top fullbacks?
 
Brian Leonard: Rutgers 6’1” 238 4.52
 
Leonard is listed all over draft boards as a fullback, but really desires to be a running back as he was in 2003. It wasn’t until the arrival of Ray Rice that Leonard became a more traditional fullback for the good of the team.  Even so, in 2005 he averaged over 100 all purpose yards per game.  While it has been said in some circles that Leonard wishes to return to his earlier role, there is the potential he may be a fullback in the NFL. 
 
The trouble with this concept is that Leonard is more of a runner as evidenced by his speed to the outside and comparisons to Justin Griffith, formerly of the Falcons.  There is also speculation that the Rutgers product may be more effective in a single-back offense as evidenced by his speed, hands, and solid running between the tackles.  As a lead blocker Leonard improved, but is not an imposing blocker, which makes him more closely resemble Justin Green than Lorenzo Neal.
 
RAVENS OUTLOOK: Leonard is projected as a first day pick and there is likely to be substantially more value at FB during day two than in the second round where the Ravens have more pressing needs at other positions.
 
Leonard video footage HERE
 
Le’Ron McClain: Alabama 6’ 257 4.94
 
McClain is shorter with some extra weight around his mid-section but more closely resembles the bowling-ball drive blocker.  However, as indicated by his time in the 40 yard dash, he isn’t a substantial threat running the football.  There are questions as to his intelligence, needing several reps to understand a play.  This may be compensated for by his reported status as a team leader who responds well to hard coaching which indicates a motivation both to work through those struggles to be a solid player.  Ultimately, it appears that McClain isn’t quite ready to start as he needs a bit of additional work on refining technique and to get into ideal football condition, which may greatly improve his mobility and speed.
 
RAVENS OUTLOOK: McClain is a solid second day pick at fullback though he is not yet ready to start, which may deter Baltimore despite his complementary skill sets when paired with Green. 
 
Jason Snelling: Virginia 5’11” 232 4.56
 
Snelling is a supremely underrated talent who is able to do everything.  Starting as a special teams standout he worked his way into the fullback role at Virginia.  After taking over the job, he drew praise for his punishing blocking style.  During his senior season Snelling was the primary tailback for the Cavaliers but struggled throughout the year with an ankle sprain.  Snelling is quite effective when asked to convert short yardage opportunities and he is an adequate receiver out of the backfield although he is more comfortable catching the ball in stride as opposed to over-the-shoulder.  Weaknesses include extensive wear and tear in college based on his injury history and he struggled temporarily holding on to the football.
 
RAVENS OUTLOOK:  Snelling could be that replacement for Mughelli as the Ravens starting fullback right out of the gate assuming he’s not set on remaining a running back.  Snelling will also go second day and may even be an undrafted free agent depending on perceptions of his use.
 
Cory Anderson, Tennessee 6’3” 259 4.7
 
This Volunteer is a pure blocker who started is collegiate career as a defensive end.  Anderson’s past is a bit checkered.  He failed to meet NCAA eligibility requirements after committing to Tennessee in 2001.  Scouts are likely to wonder why the Volunteers often featured a two tight end set if Anderson is such a good blocker limiting the FB to only six starts as a senior.  Even so, his blocking ability and adequate pass catching skills are a big reason for Tennessee’s success when running the football.  Other problems still linger as a result of his limited experience with football (Anderson did not play until his senior in high school). He struggles in pass protection and has difficulty adjusting the ball to an outside arm when turning the corner. 
 
RAVENS OUTLOOK:  Anderson is certainly a potential second day pick though his lack of versatility is problematic for any potential Ravens fullback.  If Snelling or McClain elude the Ravens, he may be next in line if a fullback is taken at all given the remaining slim pickings.
 
Other options include Jesse Allen and Tim Castille who fit the stylistic description of Anderson.
 
LINKS TO ALL REVIEWED PLAYERS BY POSITION
 
 
This article contains information from nfldraftcountdown.com, nfl.com, and various internet video. For other Ravens’ positional discussion, click on the archive icon above.
 
Ravens currently hold the following picks in the 2007 NFL Draft: Nos. 29, 61 (Round 2), 134 & 137 (Round 4 Compensatory Picks), 166 (Round 5), 174 (Round 5 Compensatory Pick), 203  (Round 6) & 207 (Round 6 Compensatory Pick).

Post your comment

Your Name:
Your Email:
Your Comment:
There are no comments. be the first to post a comment.


«Go back to the previous page.
Posted On: 4/27/07
Written By:  
Matt Ennis

Polls

From the following list who will have the most sacks in 2012?


Twitter

Check us out on Twitter
  • 5/18/12: Why Foster, McCoy and Rice are equals and should be paid accordingly: http://t.co/Q1R93XNe

View all tweets & follow us!

Got Poker Face?

E-News

Sign up for Email Alerts and get the best deals and news in your inbox.



Copyright © 2012 24x7 Network, LLC, All Rights Reserved
Website Design by D3Corp Ocean City Maryland